The 401(k) Audit Market in 2026: Who Audits America’s Retirement Plans
The State of the Employee Benefit Plan Audit Market, 2026 Edition. Who audits America’s 401(k) plans, by the numbers: a data report from 401k Audit Scout, built from every audited Form 5500 filing for plan year 2024.
Last updated · Source data: plan year 2024 Form 5500 filings
Published (data build ). Plan year 2024 is the latest complete U.S. Department of Labor bulk release. Every figure is computed from public Form 5500 Schedule H and header data. Form 5500 does not report audit fees, so no fee figures appear here.
Who audits America’s 401(k) plans?
In plan year 2024, 4,052 CPA firms signed 77,427 audited Form 5500 filings. Baker Tilly (3,776), CliftonLarsonAllen (3,451), and Forvis Mazars (2,687) lead. Ten firms perform 24.3% of retirement-plan audits, one hundred perform 58.0%, and half of all firms audit only one or two plans a year.
Summary
The U.S. employee benefit plan (EBP) audit market is fragmented at the bottom and concentrated at the top. In plan year 2024, 4,052 firms signed at least one audited Form 5500 filing, but half of them signed one or two. Ten firms performed a quarter of all retirement-plan audits; one hundred performed 58%. The Big Four are minor participants by volume, auditing fewer plans combined than Baker Tilly alone, while two firms whose audit books are almost entirely retirement plans rank in the national top 12.
Key findings
- 77,427 audited filings, 4,052 firms. Plan year 2024 produced 77,427 Form 5500 filings naming an independent auditor on Schedule H. 72,776 (94.0%) are retirement plans (401(k), 403(b), profit-sharing, ESOP, and defined benefit); the rest are large welfare plans. 4,052 EIN-identified firms signed at least one audit; 3,956 signed at least one retirement-plan audit.
- Baker Tilly, CliftonLarsonAllen, and Forvis Mazars lead. Baker Tilly US, LLP signed 3,776 audited filings (4.9% of the market), CliftonLarsonAllen 3,451 (4.5%), and Forvis Mazars 2,687 (3.5%). Each serves plan sponsors in 51 or 52 of the 55 U.S. jurisdictions in the data.
- Ten firms hold 24.3% of retirement-plan engagements; 100 hold 58.0%. The top 500 firms hold 82.0%. Yet no firm exceeds a 5.0% share, and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index is roughly 97, far below the 1,000 mark under which federal merger guidelines treat a market as unconcentrated.
- Half of all firms audit one or two plans; together they hold 3.4% of the work. The median firm audited two plans. 1,552 firms (38.3%) audited exactly one, and 2,025 (50.0%) audited one or two, accounting for 2,498 of 72,722 engagements. At the other end, 437 firms with 25 or more engagements (10.8% of firms) performed 80.0% of retirement-plan audits, and 106 firms with 100 or more performed 58.9%.
- The Big Four audit fewer plans than Baker Tilly alone, but far larger ones. Ernst & Young (629 filings), Deloitte & Touche (569), PricewaterhouseCoopers (536), and KPMG (334) signed 2,068 audited filings under their primary EINs, or 2,166 (2.8%) across all 43 EIN and name variants, against Baker Tilly’s 3,776. Their clients are an order of magnitude larger than the market: the average retirement plan audited by EY has 21,834 participants and by KPMG 20,917, versus a market-wide median of 357. The largest audited plan in the data, Walmart Inc.’s, reports 1,921,006 participants and is audited by EY.
- Retirement-plan specialists outrank every Big Four firm. Caron & Bletzer, PLLC (1,138 filings, 99.6% retirement plans) ranks #8 and Pension Assurance LLP (918, 100% retirement plans) ranks #12; Ernst & Young, the largest Big Four EBP practice by count, ranks #16. 28 of the top 100 firms derive at least 99% of their audited filings from retirement plans.
- Nearly two-thirds of firms work in a single state. 2,572 firms (63.5%) audited plans sponsored in only one state. 179 firms reach ten or more jurisdictions, 16 reach 40 or more, and three (Forvis Mazars, Baker Tilly, CliftonLarsonAllen) reach 50 or more.
- California is 11.1% of the market. Plans sponsored in California account for 8,081 audited retirement filings, followed by New York (5,755), Texas (4,845), Pennsylvania (3,672), and Illinois (3,540). The ten largest states hold 54.3% of audited retirement plans; 23 jurisdictions have at least 1,000.
- State leadership is split between national and regional firms. Baker Tilly and Eide Bailly each lead seven jurisdictions (Baker Tilly: CA, NM, OR, PA, TX, WA, WV; Eide Bailly: ID, MT, ND, NV, OK, SD, WY); CliftonLarsonAllen leads five and Forvis Mazars four. A national top-10 firm leads 30 of 55 jurisdictions, but 21 are led by a firm outside the national top 25, including Ohio (Clark, Schaefer, Hackett & Co., 258 plans), Tennessee (LBMC, 216), Florida (Assurance Dimensions, 206), and Nebraska (Lutz & Company, 121). Across the 50 states and D.C., the median leader holds 13.7% of its state’s audits, from 38.9% in South Dakota and 37.0% in North Dakota (both Eide Bailly) down to 6.4% in Texas, New York, and Illinois.
- The typical audited plan is small. The median audited retirement plan has 357 participants; 34.3% have 100 to 249, 61.6% have fewer than 500, and 78.0% have fewer than 1,000. Only 5.6% (4,105 plans) have 5,000 or more. 367 plans with fewer than 100 participants were audited anyway, typically because of non-qualifying assets, short plan years, or the pre-2023 participant-counting method.
- 96.9% of audits carried an unmodified opinion. Of 77,427 audited filings, 75,047 were unmodified, 247 qualified (0.3%), 2,023 disclaimers (2.6%), 2 adverse, and 108 reported no opinion type. Disclaimers are coded on 6.4% of engagements at firms with one to four plans versus 2.4% at firms with 100 or more. Because the disclaimer category historically captured limited-scope audits before SAS 136 replaced that report format, the gap is best read as a difference in reporting convention, not audit outcome.
Table 1. The ten largest employee benefit plan audit practices, plan year 2024
| Rank | Firm | Audited filings (all plan types) | Retirement-plan filings | Jurisdictions served | Share of all audited filings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baker Tilly US, LLP | 3,776 | 3,633 | 51 | 4.9% |
| 2 | CliftonLarsonAllen LLP | 3,451 | 3,276 | 51 | 4.5% |
| 3 | Forvis Mazars, LLP | 2,687 | 2,583 | 52 | 3.5% |
| 4 | CBIZ CPAs P.C. | 1,663 | 1,616 | 48 | 2.1% |
| 5 | BDO USA, P.C. | 1,288 | 1,237 | 45 | 1.7% |
| 6 | Plante & Moran, PLLC | 1,217 | 1,182 | 45 | 1.6% |
| 7 | Eide Bailly LLP | 1,204 | 1,144 | 42 | 1.6% |
| 8 | Caron & Bletzer, PLLC | 1,138 | 1,133 | 41 | 1.5% |
| 9 | WithumSmith+Brown, PC | 1,023 | 870 | 39 | 1.3% |
| 10 | RSM US LLP | 984 | 954 | 45 | 1.3% |
League-table basis: all audited Form 5500 filings signed under the firm’s EIN, including large welfare plans. Together the ten signed 18,431 filings, 23.8% of 77,427. Full top 100: national rankings.
Table 2. Firms by audit volume, plan year 2024
| Retirement-plan audits signed | Firms | Share of firms | Engagements | Share of engagements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (welfare plans only) | 96 | 2.4% | 0 | 0.0% |
| 1 | 1,552 | 38.3% | 1,552 | 2.1% |
| 2 to 4 | 987 | 24.4% | 2,710 | 3.7% |
| 5 to 9 | 528 | 13.0% | 3,505 | 4.8% |
| 10 to 24 | 452 | 11.2% | 6,771 | 9.3% |
| 25 to 49 | 227 | 5.6% | 7,976 | 11.0% |
| 50 to 99 | 104 | 2.6% | 7,399 | 10.2% |
| 100 to 499 | 87 | 2.1% | 18,899 | 26.0% |
| 500 or more | 19 | 0.5% | 23,910 | 32.9% |
| Total | 4,052 | 100% | 72,722 | 100% |
Retirement-plan filings attributed to EIN-identified firms. The 19 firms with 500 or more engagements audit more plans (23,910) than the 3,067 firms with one to nine engagements combined (7,767).
Table 3. The ten largest state markets and their leading firms, plan year 2024
| State | Audited retirement plans | Share of U.S. | Active firms | Median plan size (participants) | Leading firm (plans, share of state) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California | 8,081 | 11.1% | 759 | 331 | Baker Tilly US (867, 10.7%) |
| New York | 5,755 | 7.9% | 578 | 391 | Bonadio & Co. (369, 6.4%) |
| Texas | 4,845 | 6.7% | 576 | 383 | Baker Tilly US (308, 6.4%) |
| Pennsylvania | 3,672 | 5.1% | 426 | 377 | Baker Tilly US (311, 8.5%) |
| Illinois | 3,540 | 4.9% | 387 | 397 | Sikich CPA (228, 6.4%) |
| Ohio | 3,121 | 4.3% | 316 | 350 | Clark, Schaefer, Hackett & Co. (258, 8.3%) |
| Florida | 3,082 | 4.2% | 505 | 370 | Assurance Dimensions (206, 6.7%) |
| Massachusetts | 2,560 | 3.5% | 283 | 343 | Caron & Bletzer (393, 15.4%) |
| Michigan | 2,487 | 3.4% | 283 | 344 | Plante & Moran (406, 16.3%) |
| New Jersey | 2,355 | 3.2% | 397 | 410 | WithumSmith+Brown (170, 7.2%) |
State is the plan sponsor’s address on Form 5500, not the auditor’s office. “Active firms” have at least one audited retirement plan sponsored in the state. Shares are of the 72,690 retirement filings with a U.S. sponsor state. State directories: audit firms by state.
Table 4. Audited retirement plans by participant count, plan year 2024
| Participants (beginning of year) | Audited plans | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Under 100 | 367 | 0.5% |
| 100 to 249 | 24,961 | 34.3% |
| 250 to 499 | 19,494 | 26.8% |
| 500 to 999 | 11,914 | 16.4% |
| 1,000 to 4,999 | 11,935 | 16.4% |
| 5,000 or more | 4,105 | 5.6% |
| Total | 72,776 | 100% |
Median: 357 participants. Highest state medians (50 states and D.C.): Tennessee (421), Georgia (414), New Jersey (410). Lowest among states with 200 or more audited plans: Vermont (286), North Dakota (293), New Mexico (297).
Quotable statistics
- Half of the firms that sign 401(k) plan audits sign one or two a year; together they account for 3.4% of engagements.
- 437 firms, 10.8% of the total, perform 80.0% of U.S. retirement-plan audits.
- Baker Tilly audited more employee benefit plans in 2024 than the Big Four combined: 3,776 versus 2,166.
- Ten firms perform 24.3% of retirement-plan audits; one hundred firms perform 58.0%.
- The median audit firm in this market audits two plans a year; the median audited plan has 357 participants.
- 63.5% of plan audit firms work in a single state; three firms audit plans in 50 or more jurisdictions.
- Six in ten audited retirement plans (61.6%) have fewer than 500 participants.
- Two firms whose audit books are at least 99.5% retirement plans rank #8 and #12 nationally, ahead of every Big Four firm.
- Eide Bailly is the leading plan auditor in seven states; so is Baker Tilly. No other firm leads more than five.
- 96.9% of audited filings carried an unmodified opinion; two of 77,427 were adverse.
Methodology
Source. U.S. Department of Labor EFAST2 Form 5500 bulk datasets for plan year 2024: the Form 5500 header file and the Schedule H file, joined on the filing’s acknowledgment ID (dol.gov Form 5500 datasets).
Definitions. Audited filing: a Schedule H row naming an independent qualified public accountant. Retirement plan: a single-employer, multiemployer, or multiple-employer plan (entity codes 1 to 3) with a pension benefit code; welfare-only filings and direct filing entities are excluded from retirement counts. Firm: all filings sharing an accountant EIN, shown under the most common spelling in its filings. State: the sponsor’s address state. Participants: beginning-of-year total as filed (active participants when blank). Opinion type: the Schedule H accountant’s opinion code as filed.
Two counting bases, always labeled. Table 1 counts all audited filings including welfare plans, matching published league tables. Concentration shares, firm-size buckets, state tables, and plan-size figures use retirement-plan filings only.
Denominators. Concentration shares and Table 2 use 72,722 retirement engagements attributed to EIN-identified firms (54 filings name an auditor without an EIN). State shares use 72,690 filings with a U.S. sponsor state (86 lack one). Opinion totals cover all 77,427 audited filings. Big Four counts use primary EINs, with variants reported separately. The HHI sums squared percentage shares across all EIN-identified firms.
Limitations. Firms that merged, rebranded, or file under several EINs can appear split or combined until filings catch up. Participant counts, names, and EINs are sponsor-entered and inherit filer errors. Late and amended filings after the snapshot appear only in the next refresh. Plan year 2024 is the second year under the DOL’s revised participant-counting rule for defined contribution plans, so comparisons with pre-2023 league tables are not like-for-like. Engagement volume measures experience, not audit quality. Form 5500 does not report audit fees; no fee figures appear in this report or the dataset.
Reproducibility. Firm ordering, slugs, and tie-breaks are deterministic; rebuilding from the same DOL files yields identical output. Every firm and state figure here can be checked against its page on this site. The figures in this edition are fixed as of the 2026-09-06 data build; the live rankings and firm profiles are refreshed with each DOL release and may move slightly as late filings arrive. Full definitions: methodology.
About the data and 401k Audit Scout
401k Audit Scout is an independent directory of employee benefit plan audit firms, built from public U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 data. It profiles 4,052 audit firms across 55 U.S. states and territories and ranks them by the audit engagements they signed in plan year 2024. No firm pays to be listed, to rank, or to be removed. The dataset is refreshed with each annual DOL bulk release. Corrections against the underlying filings: corrections@401kauditscout.com.
Cite this report
Suggested citation: 401k Audit Scout, "The State of the Employee Benefit Plan Audit Market, 2026 Edition," September 2026, analysis of U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 filings for plan year 2024. https://401kauditscout.com/research/ebp-audit-market-2026/
401k Audit Scout is an independent directory of employee benefit plan audit firms, built from public U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 data.
Published ; figures from the data build of plan year 2024 Form 5500 filings. Content may be quoted with attribution to 401k Audit Scout and a link to this page.